




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NOi contro la CORRUZIONE &#187; maladministration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anticorruzione.eu/tag/maladministration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anticorruzione.eu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>OECD &#8211; W.G. on Bribery, Paris, 10 &#8211; 13 mar 2020 &#8211; Plenary Meetings working Group on Bribery</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/oecd-w-g-on-bribery-paris-10-13-mar-2020-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/oecd-w-g-on-bribery-paris-10-13-mar-2020-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Anticorruzione Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/oecd-2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7277" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/oecd-2.jpg" alt="oecd 2" width="274" height="184" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system is conducted in successive phases and is considered by Transparency International to be the ‘gold standard’ of monitoring.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Made up of representatives from the States Parties to the Convention, the Working Group meets four times per year in Paris and publishes all of its country monitoring reports online.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/oecdworkinggrouponbriberyininternationalbusinesstransactions.htm">http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/oecdworkinggrouponbriberyininternationalbusinesstransactions.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/oecd-w-g-on-bribery-paris-10-13-mar-2020-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lagos, 23 &#8211; 25 feb. 2020, IBA Anti-Corruption in Africa Conference</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/lagos-23-25-feb-2020-iba-anti-corruption-in-africa-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/lagos-23-25-feb-2020-iba-anti-corruption-in-africa-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOPICS INCLUDE: The use of technology in the fight against corruption Anti- corruption, human rights and business The judiciary and anti-corruption: building confidence in the legal system Anti-corruption: legal frameworks and policies in Africa The EU and Brexit: lessons for the African Union The Cotonou Agreement 2020: how the new agreement will and should be [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h5></h5>
<h5><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/maladministration.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6978" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/maladministration.jpg" alt="maladministration" width="275" height="183" /></a></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5>TOPICS INCLUDE:</h5>
<ul>
<li>The use of technology in the fight against corruption</li>
<li>Anti- corruption, human rights and business</li>
<li>The judiciary and anti-corruption: building confidence in the legal system</li>
<li>Anti-corruption: legal frameworks and policies in Africa</li>
<li>The EU and Brexit: lessons for the African Union</li>
<li>The Cotonou Agreement 2020: how the new agreement will and should be drafted on mutual partnership</li>
</ul>
<p>More information:</p>
<p>https://www.ibanet.org/Conferences/conf1020.aspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/lagos-23-25-feb-2020-iba-anti-corruption-in-africa-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COE, STRASBOURG, 2 &#8211; 6 dec. 2019, GRECO 84th Plenary Meeting</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/coe-strasbourg-2-6-dec-2019-greco-84th-plenary-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/coe-strasbourg-2-6-dec-2019-greco-84th-plenary-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Azione di governo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maladministration e sprechi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; At its 83rd Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 17-21 June 2019), the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO): High-level conference: “GRECO: past, present &#38; future” (Monday 17 June – a.m.) 1. warmly welcomed the holding of this high-level event to mark GRECO’s 20th anniversary in cooperation with the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5793" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png" alt="Schermata 2017-04-13 alle 08.45.03" width="235" height="176" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>At its 83rd Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 17-21 June 2019), the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO):</p>
<p>High-level conference: “GRECO: past, present &amp; future” (Monday 17 June – a.m.)</p>
<p>1. warmly welcomed the holding of this high-level event to mark GRECO’s 20th anniversary in cooperation with the French Presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;1 and noted with pleasure the support expressed for GRECO’s work;</p>
<p>83rd Plenary Meeting</p>
<ol start="2">
<li>took note of the request by the Delegation of Denmark to postpone to a future meeting the examination of the Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark because of general elections held in June; as evaluations are of a technical not a political nature, GRECO decided to uphold the previous decisions by GRECO’s President and Bureau to not accept the request;</li>
<li>adopted the agenda of the meeting which was chaired by Marin MRČELA (President of GRECO, Croatia), and by Ernst GNAEGI (Bureau member, Switzerland) when the President had other commitments;</li>
</ol>
<p>Information</p>
<ol start="4">
<li>took note of information provided by Marin MRČELA, President of GRECO, and Gianluca ESPOSITO, Executive Secretary of GRECO;</li>
<li>took note of the list of items discussed and decisions taken by Bureau 87 (Greco(2019)6);</li>
<li>noted with regret that the Head of delegation of France, Agnès MAITREPIERRE, is leaving her country’s delegation and her position as GRECO’s Vice-President and wished her every success in her new functions;</li>
<li>noted that elections to fill the position of Vice-President will be held at GRECO 84 (2-6 December 2019) and that GRECO representatives are invited to inform the Executive Secretary in writing if they wish to stand for election/or to nominate a candidate, preferably by 1 October 2019, it nevertheless being understood that, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure (Rule 5), candidatures can be submitted up to 48 hours before the elections are held;</li>
</ol>
<p>Evaluation procedures</p>
<p>Fifth Round</p>
<ol start="8">
<li>adopted the Fifth Round Evaluation Reports on:
<ul>
<li>  Denmark (GrecoEval5Rep(2018)8)</li>
<li>  the Slovak Republic (GrecoEval5Rep(2018)9)</li>
<li>  Spain (GrecoEval5Rep(2018)5)and set the deadline of 31 December 2020 for the submission of situation reports on measures taken to implement GRECO’s recommendations;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>invites the authorities of Denmark, the Slovak Republic and Spain to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the reports mentioned in decision 8 above;</li>
</ol>
<p>1 Conference website : https://www.coe.int/en/web/greco/20th-anniversary-of-greco 2</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/3522a42e-b0b0-4801-976e-9a7f392a322b" alt="page2image3625477312" width="53.400000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/b349146f-4bf8-40ad-9712-520451879b9d" alt="page2image3625477584" width="100.200000" height="0.720030" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/beeea311-d2ca-4bad-a69e-cf20f95263ff" alt="page2image3625477856" width="144.020000" height="0.600040" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/4f9280ef-5792-4049-b1b0-6b10364a88a6" alt="page2image3625478128" width="229.850000" height="0.599980" /></p>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 3">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Compliance procedures</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/942232d2-5ac0-49d8-b0e6-5ee1af6e7d9c" alt="page3image3528080368" width="105.620000" height="0.720000" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Third Round<br />
10. adopted the 6th Interim Third Round Compliance Report on:</p>
<p> Switzerland (GrecoRC3(2019)5)</p>
<p>and decided not to continue applying Rule 32 in the case of that member;</p>
<ol start="11">
<li>in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.2 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Head of delegation of Switzerland to submit additional information regarding action taken to implement certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Third Round Compliance Report on:</li>
</ol>
<p> Denmark (GrecoRC3(2019)6)</p>
<p>and, in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 9 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Head of Delegation of Denmark to submit additional information regarding the implementation of certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</p>
<p>13. adopted the 2nd Addendum to the 2nd Third Round Compliance Report on:<br />
 the Russian Federation (GrecoRC3(2019)4)<br />
and terminated the compliance procedure in respect of this member, in this round;</p>
<p>14. invites the authorities of Switzerland, Denmark and the Russian Federation to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the reports mentioned in decisions 10, 12 and 13 above;</p>
<p>Fourth Round</p>
<ol start="15">
<li>adopted the Interim Fourth Round Compliance Reports on:
<ul>
<li>  Portugal (GrecoRC4(2019)13)</li>
<li>  Romania (GrecoRC4(2019)11)and concluded, in both cases, that the level of compliance with the recommendations remains “globally unsatisfactory” in the meaning of Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.3 of the Rules of Procedure;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>in accordance with Rule 32, paragraph 2 (i) of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Heads of delegation of Portugal and Romania to provide reports on progress in implementing the outstanding recommendations by 30 June 2020 at the latest (in the case of Romania, see also decision 27);</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>3</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 4">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ol start="17">
<li>pursuant to Rule 32, paragraph 2 (ii) a) of the Rules of Procedure, invites its President to send letters – with a copy to the President of the Statutory Committee – to the Heads of Delegation of Portugal and Romania on the need to take determined action with a view to achieving tangible progress as soon as possible;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Interim Fourth Round Compliance Report on:
<ul>
<li>  Belgium (GrecoRC4(2019)15)</li>
<li>  Spain (GrecoRC4(2019)12)and decided not to continue applying Rule 32 in the case of both members;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.2 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Heads of delegation of Belgium and Spain to submit additional information regarding action taken to implement certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Fourth Round Compliance Report on:</li>
</ol>
<p> Germany (GrecoRC4(2019)17)</p>
<p>and concluded that the level of compliance with the recommendations is “globally unsatisfactory” in the meaning of Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.3 of the Rules of Procedure;</p>
<ol start="21">
<li>pursuant to Rule 32, paragraph 2 (i), requests the Head of delegation of Germany to provide a report on progress in implementing the outstanding recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Fourth Round Compliance Reports on:
<ul>
<li>  Lithuania (GrecoRC4(2019)18)</li>
<li>  Malta (GrecoRC4(2019)14)and, in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 9 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Heads of Delegation of Lithuania and Malta to submit additional information regarding the implementation of certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Adopted the Addendum to the 2nd Fourth Round Compliance Report on:</li>
</ol>
<p> Iceland (GrecoRC4(2019)16)</p>
<p>and, in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 9 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Head of delegation of Iceland to submit additional information regarding the implementation of certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</p>
<ol start="24">
<li>noted with satisfaction that the authorities of Iceland authorise the publication of the report mentioned in decision 23 above;</li>
<li>invites the authorities of Portugal, Romania, Belgium, Spain, Germany, Lithuania and Malta to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the reports mentioned in decisions 15, 18, 20 et 22 above;</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>4</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 5">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Fifth Round</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>26. approved the list of rapporteur countries for the Fifth Round compliance procedures in respect of the following countries: Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Slovenia and the United Kingdom (GrecoEval5(2019)1)</p>
<p>Rule 34 – Ad hoc procedure</p>
<ol start="27">
<li>adopted the Follow-up Report (Greco-AdHocRep(2019)1) to the Ad hoc Report (Rule 34) on Romania and invites the Head of Delegation of Romania to submit, by 30 June 2020, additional information on the implementation of those ad hoc recommendations under the ongoing Fourth Round compliance procedure;</li>
<li>invites the authorities of Romania to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the report mentioned in decision 27 above;</li>
<li>pursuant to Rule 34, decided to initiate an ad hoc procedure in respect of Greece (Greco(2019)9- rev) and to request the Head of Delegation to submit, by 30 September 2019,2 detailed official information concerning the recently amended Article 236 of the Criminal Code and its impact on the effectiveness of the fight against corruption, to be examined at GRECO 84 (2-6 December 2019);</li>
<li>at the request of the Head of delegation of Slovenia and on the basis of information and documents provided by her, decided, pursuant to Rule 34, to request the Head of Delegation to submit, by 30 June 2019, any additional information concerning the separation of powers between the legislature and the judiciary in Slovenia;</li>
<li>instructed the Secretariat to nominate rapporteurs for the above procedures in respect of Greece and Slovenia once the additional official information is received;</li>
</ol>
<p>Evaluation of the Council of Europe support in the fight against corruption – follow-up to be given to the recommendations of the Directorate of Internal Oversight (DIO)</p>
<ol start="32">
<li>welcomed the result of the discussion by Bureau 87 on follow-up (action plan: Greco(2019)8);</li>
<li>discussed further follow-up to be included in the action plan, instructed the Secretariat to revise the action plan accordingly and to inform the Directorate of Internal Oversight of the result of the consultation of the Bureau and the Plenary;</li>
</ol>
<p>Request for observer status in GRECO – European Union</p>
<ol start="34">
<li>considered the request by the European Union for observer status in GRECO (Greco(2019)7) prepared under the Romanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and signed by European Commission First Vice-President Frans TIMMERMANS and Commissioner Dimitris AVRAMOPOULOS;</li>
<li>noted that all GRECO member States except Turkey3 agreed to grant observer status in GRECO to the European Union, and therefore decided to refer the European Union’s request to the Committee of Ministers for decision;</li>
</ol>
<p>2 Should this legislation not enter into force, the application of the Rule 34 procedure will be reviewed.<br />
3 The Delegation of Turkey underlined that it supports the European Union participating in GRECO as a member but not as an observer.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/73c6c8ae-3a82-46fd-bd5e-d385e9139d26" alt="page5image3626013184" width="123.620000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/200ffe9a-eff2-4426-abe6-b489ba1622ef" alt="page5image3626013456" width="463.660000" height="0.720000" /><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/7f6e2bb6-1970-46d5-9280-8ee3a3e4f128" alt="page5image3626013728" width="302.450000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/50fd3384-782b-4689-baf4-5cda84ff7bd5" alt="page5image3626014064" width="251.210000" height="0.720030" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/f7de70b8-1808-45ba-b102-598677053ebc" alt="page5image3626014336" width="144.020000" height="0.599980" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>5</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 6">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Budgetary situation &#8211; update</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/5a1923f0-dc16-4efd-8ca4-36cca1cc9836" alt="page6image3626191680" width="127.940000" height="0.720000" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ol start="36">
<li>noted that a meeting of GRECO’s Statutory Committee is scheduled on 28 June 2019 to consider, if necessary, whether to not apply Article 8, paragraph 6 of GRECO’s Statute in respect of the Russian Federation; the relevant provision stipulates that “unless otherwise decided by the Statutory Committee, a member which has failed to pay all or a substantial part of its compulsory contribution to the budget of the enlarged partial agreement for a period of two years, shall no longer take part in the decision-making process”;</li>
<li>welcomed the additional financial and/or “in-kind” contributions for the 2018/2019 biennium made so far by Armenia, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United States, and the more recent announcement of a contribution from Sweden; noted that these contributions are instrumental in enabling GRECO to carry out its programme of activities and that the call for voluntary contributions will be renewed for the 2020/2021 budget;</li>
</ol>
<p>Topical anti-corruption developments/events in member States (Item 4)</p>
<p>38. took note of the information provided by the Delegations of Cyprus,4 Hungary, Italy,5 Republic of Moldova,6 Montenegro, Serbia and Sweden;</p>
<p>Publication of Reports7</p>
<p>39. called on the authorities of the member States concerned (Austria,8 Belarus,9 Georgia,10 Hungary,11 Republic of Moldova12) to authorise without further delay the publication of the reports adopted by GRECO at previous plenary meetings, noting that the reports on Belarus date back to the period 2012-2017 and two of the reports on Hungary date back to March and June 2017;</p>
<p>Information from observer organisations and Council of Europe bodies</p>
<p>40. took note of the information provided by the representative of UNODC, notably in relation to the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on anti-corruption that will be held in 2021;</p>
<p>4 GRECO took note of the information provided by Cyprus in relation to the “Guide to judicial conduct”, training, and criteria for the appointment of judges and will take it into account in the context of the ongoing Fourth Round compliance procedure. 5 Given that the information provided by Italy concerns an evolving situation on a matter covered by the previous evaluation round, GRECO invites the Italian delegation to provide an up-date at GRECO 84 (December 2019).</p>
<p>6 GRECO invites the Moldovan delegation to provide written information concerning the composition of the Superior Council of Prosecutors and the transparency of the legislative process by 31 July 2019.<br />
7 Action to be taken when publishing adopted reports (decision 26, GRECO 58):</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8211;  agree a same-day publication date with the Secretariat</li>
<li>&#8211;  clearly mark both the date of adoption and date of publication on the cover page</li>
<li>&#8211;  make the national language version available and easily accessible on a domestic website</li>
<li>&#8211;  notify the Secretariat of the location of the report by communicating the internet link to it</li>
<li>&#8211;  include a link on the domestic website to the official language versions on GRECO’s website.8 Fourth Round Compliance Report.<br />
9 All reports from the Joint First and Second Rounds; Third Round Evaluation Report; Third Round Compliance Report.<br />
10 Fourth Round Compliance Report.<br />
11 2nd Addendum to the 2nd Third Round Compliance Report; Fourth Round Compliance Report; Interim Fourth Round Compliance Report.<br />
12 Fourth Round Compliance Report.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/aed71500-d39a-4c0d-85a3-a597297bbea9" alt="page6image3624703520" width="284.210000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/bfa50736-9614-46ac-a556-eff5a5a58d24" alt="page6image3624703920" width="102.480000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/ffc578f0-7886-4943-adc4-1f34c993b513" alt="page6image3624704256" width="315.290000" height="0.720000" /><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/973500e6-3834-46b0-87a5-146f00bb8c65" alt="page6image3624704528" width="144.020000" height="0.599980" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/d6e8ae56-83f5-4d9d-94df-c6b256b1e821" alt="page6image3624705136" width="200.570000" height="0.599980" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>6</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 7">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Miscellaneous<br />
41. welcomed the availability, since 17 June 2019, of the HUDOC-GRECO Database;</p>
<p>Forthcoming meetings<br />
42. took note of the following dates:</p>
<p>2019</p>
<ul>
<li>  88th Bureau meeting (Strasbourg, 18 October 2019)</li>
<li>  84th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 2-6 December 2019)2020</li>
<li>  85th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 16-20 March 2020)</li>
<li>  86th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 25-29 May 2020)</li>
<li>  87th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 26-30 October 2020).</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/coe-strasbourg-2-6-dec-2019-greco-84th-plenary-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU, OLAF, BRUSSELS, 7 Nov. 2019, Meeting of the Fraud Prevention Group</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/eu-olaf-brussels-7-nov-2019-meeting-of-the-fraud-prevention-group/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/eu-olaf-brussels-7-nov-2019-meeting-of-the-fraud-prevention-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unione Europea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OLAF investigates fraud against the EU budget, corruption and serious misconduct within the European institutions, and develops anti-fraud policy for the European Commission. This group provides a forum for national authorities and the Commission to share experience and best practice in areas such as: Fraud risk assessment Fraud typology National/sectoral fraud prevention strategies, policies and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-olaf_0.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7180" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-olaf_0.png" alt="logo-olaf_0" width="220" height="51" /></a></p>
<p>OLAF investigates fraud against the EU budget, corruption and serious misconduct within the European institutions, and develops anti-fraud policy for the European Commission.</p>
<p>This group provides a forum for national authorities and the Commission to share experience and best practice in areas such as:</p>
<p>Fraud risk assessment<br />
Fraud typology<br />
National/sectoral fraud prevention strategies, policies and measures<br />
How managing, certifying and audit services contribute to fraud prevention and detection<br />
How IT is used to track potential fraud cases and identify risks<br />
Awareness raising &amp; training of desk officers, financial bodies and auditors<br />
Twinning projects &amp; activities funded by the Hercule programme<br />
Anonymised case studies.<br />
This group may address issues involving EU funds (European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), Agriculture Funds, Fisheries Funds, Asylum and Migration Funds, …).</p>
<p>This group brings together national authorities responsible for reporting on fraud and irregularities and a number of Commission services, and deals with:</p>
<p>The Commission&#8217;s Annual Report on the protection of the EU’s financial interests (also known as the &#8220;PIF-Report&#8221; or the &#8220;Article 325 TFEU-Report&#8221;); prepared annually in cooperation with the Member States.<br />
The sectoral irregularity reporting provisions<br />
The Irregularity Management System (IMS)<br />
Statistical analysis of reported irregularity cases</p>
<p>Materiali all&#8217;indirizzo:<br />
https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/media-corner/events/19-12-2018/meeting-fraud-prevention-group_en</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/eu-olaf-brussels-7-nov-2019-meeting-of-the-fraud-prevention-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OECD, PARIS, WG ON BRIBERY, 10-13 dec 2019, Plenary Meetings Working Group on Bribery</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/oecd-paris-8-11-oct-2019-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/oecd-paris-8-11-oct-2019-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unione Europea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system is conducted in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/oecd_logo.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5767" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/oecd_logo.png" alt="oecd_logo" width="567" height="175" /></a></p>
<p>Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system is conducted in successive phases and is considered by Transparency International to be the ‘gold standard’ of monitoring.</p>
<p>http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/oecdworkinggrouponbriberyininternationalbusinesstransactions.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/oecd-paris-8-11-oct-2019-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROMA, sede CNEL, 8 Oct. 2019, Lotta alla corruzione: volontà, metodi e strumenti. Case history e best practice italiane</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/roma-sede-cnel-8-oct-2019-lotta-alla-corruzione-volonta-metodi-e-strumenti-case-history-e-best-practice-italiane/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/roma-sede-cnel-8-oct-2019-lotta-alla-corruzione-volonta-metodi-e-strumenti-case-history-e-best-practice-italiane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione di governo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Anticorruzione Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A un anno dal successo del convegno “Lotta alla corruzione: volontà, metodi e strumenti. Case history e best practice italiane”, l’Università di Tor Vergata (Master Anticorruzione), Riparte il Futuro e 4cLegal propongono la seconda edizione aggiornata e arricchita. Un nuovo momento di riflessione per riprendere le fila di un tema quanto mai attuale, affrontato in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A un anno dal successo del convegno “Lotta alla corruzione: volontà, metodi e strumenti. Case history e best practice italiane”, l’Università di Tor Vergata (Master Anticorruzione), Riparte il Futuro e 4cLegal propongono la seconda edizione aggiornata e arricchita. Un nuovo momento di riflessione per riprendere le fila di un tema quanto mai attuale, affrontato in modo profondo e innovativo. Obiettivo: evidenziare casi di best practice, soluzioni e strumenti a diposizione delle imprese italiane, pubbliche e private. La prevenzione della corruzione non è solo un obbligo, ma un’occasione importante per generare valore.<br />
https://www.4clegal.com/eventi/roma-lotta-corruzione-volonta-metodi-strumenti-case-history-best-practice-italiane-ii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/roma-sede-cnel-8-oct-2019-lotta-alla-corruzione-volonta-metodi-e-strumenti-case-history-e-best-practice-italiane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WIEN, UNCAC, 2-4 Sept. 2019, 10th session of the Implementation Review Group</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/07/wien-uncac-2-4-sept-2019-10th-session-of-the-implementation-review-group/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/07/wien-uncac-2-4-sept-2019-10th-session-of-the-implementation-review-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cittadini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trasparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNCAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNODC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; The Implementation Review Group is a subsidiary body of the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption. It is responsible for having an overview of the review process and consider technical assistance requirements for the effective implementation of the Convention. In 2016, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/UNODC2.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6922" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/UNODC2.png" alt="UNODC" width="242" height="208" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The <strong>Implementation Review Group</strong> is a subsidiary body of the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption. It is responsible for having an overview of the review process and consider technical assistance requirements for the effective implementation of the Convention.</p>
<p>In 2016, the Group adopted a multi-year workplan for its analytical work, covering the period from 2017 to 2019. This workplan dedicates each session and resumed session of the Group to a particular topic. The Group holds one session and a maximum of two resumed sessions per year, during which time participants are able to share information on the country reviews and discuss substantive issues related to the reviews and to technical assistance.</p>
<p>Through its resolution 3/1 and the terms of reference for the Mechanism, the Conference established the <strong>Implementation Review Group</strong> as an open-ended intergovernmental group of States parties, which operates under the authority of and reports to the Conference. The terms of reference set forth that:</p>
<p>“[…]</p>
<p>42. The Implementation Review Group shall be an open-ended intergovernmental group of States parties. It shall operate under the authority of and report to the Conference.</p>
<p>43. The Implementation Review Group shall hold meetings at least once a year in Vienna.</p>
<p>44. The functions of the Implementation Review Group shall be to have an overview of the review process in order to identify challenges and good practices and to consider technical assistance requirements in order to ensure effective implementation of the Convention. The thematic implementation report shall serve as the basis for the analytical work of the Implementation Review Group. On the basis of its deliberations, the Implementation Review Group shall submit recommendations and conclusions to the Conference for its consideration and approval.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/IRG/implementation-review-group.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/07/wien-uncac-2-4-sept-2019-10th-session-of-the-implementation-review-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IL PREMIO AMBROSOLI.  LE DIFFICOLTÀ DI FARE IL PROPRIO DOVERE.</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/il-premio-ambrosoli-le-difficolta-di-fare-il-proprio-dovere/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/il-premio-ambrosoli-le-difficolta-di-fare-il-proprio-dovere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione di governo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Che si dice in giro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiltrazioni mafiose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maladministration e sprechi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambrosoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meritocrazia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report anti-corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Era il 25 febbraio 1975, in una lettera alla moglie l’avvocato Giorgio Ambrosoli scriveva: “…  ho sempre operato &#8211; ne ho la piena coscienza &#8211; solo nell&#8217;interesse del paese, creandomi ovviamente solo nemici perché tutti quelli che hanno per mio merito avuto quanto [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/5.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7099" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/5.jpg" alt="5" width="628" height="382" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Era il 25 febbraio 1975, in una lettera alla moglie l’avvocato Giorgio Ambrosoli scriveva: “…  <em>ho sempre operato &#8211; ne ho la piena coscienza &#8211; solo nell&#8217;interesse del paese, creandomi ovviamente solo nemici perché tutti quelli che hanno per mio merito avuto quanto loro spettava non sono certo riconoscenti perché credono di aver avuto solo quello che a loro spettava: ed hanno ragione, anche se, non fossi stato io, avrebbero recuperato i loro averi parecchi mesi dopo …  i nemici comunque non aiutano, e cercheranno in ogni modo di farmi scivolare su qualche fesseria, e purtroppo, quando devi firmare centinaia di lettere al giorno, puoi anche firmare fesserie….”.</em></p>
<p>Come ricordato nel corso della cerimonia <strong>il senso del dovere, l’etica del lavoro, la partecipazione non devono essere eccezioni, perché r</strong>ivendicare diritti non basta, ci vogliono i doveri.</p>
<p>Anche perché se la normalità è diventata eroica, ciò presuppone che l’anormalità sia diventa normale: quella tra cittadino e legalità appare, quindi, come una relazionein parte sofferta. È sufficiente fermarsi a riflettere su come il normalesenso civico, se e dove esiste, finisca con il venir descritto e vissuto comeuna «virtù eroica», un calvario che adduce al martirio e alla successivabeatificazione laica, quasi che il fare il proprio dovere di cittadino,di lavoratore, di padre di famiglia, non sia più la normalità.</p>
<p>E che, giunti a questo punto, sia superfluo. Dimenticando, magari, come «la disperazione più grave che possa impadronirsi d’una società – ricordava Corrado Alvaro – è il dubbio che vivere rettamente sia inutile».</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/il-premio-ambrosoli-le-difficolta-di-fare-il-proprio-dovere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IL PRESIDENTE MATTARELLA AL PREMIO AMBROSOLI.  AMBROSOLI: &#8220;È STATA UN&#8217;OCCASIONE UNICA DI FARE QUALCOSA PER IL PAESE&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/il-presidente-mattarella-al-premio-ambrosoli-ambrosoli-e-stata-unoccasione-unica-di-fare-qualcosa-per-il-paese/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/il-presidente-mattarella-al-premio-ambrosoli-ambrosoli-e-stata-unoccasione-unica-di-fare-qualcosa-per-il-paese/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione di governo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Che si dice in giro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiltrazioni mafiose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maladministration e sprechi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambrosoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meritocrazia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trasparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Era il 25 febbraio 1975, in una lettera alla moglie l’avvocato Giorgio Ambrosoli scriveva: “…  È indubbio che, in ogni caso, pagherò a molto caro prezzo l&#8217;incarico: lo sapevo prima di accettarlo e quindi non mi lamento affatto perché per me è stata un&#8217;occasione unica [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/4.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7096" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/4.png" alt="4" width="640" height="360" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Era il 25 febbraio 1975, in una lettera alla moglie l’avvocato Giorgio Ambrosoli scriveva: “…  <em>È indubbio che, in ogni caso, pagherò a molto caro prezzo l&#8217;incarico: lo sapevo prima di accettarlo e quindi non mi lamento affatto perché per me è stata un&#8217;occasione unica di fare qualcosa per il paese…”.</em></p>
<p>Frase ripetuta, qualche tempo dopo, quando consegna alla Banca d’Italia il primo frutto del suo lavoro, lo stato passivo della Banca Privata (che tra l’altro taglia fuori lo IOR), acclude un biglietto per il governatore: <em>«Con i migliori sentimenti di devozione per avermi dato modo di servire in qualche modo il Paese».</em></p>
<p>Come ricordato nel corso della cerimonia, <strong>se solo gli eroi fanno il loro dovere, cosa fanno gli altri?</strong> In paesi con più alto senso civico, il valore della legalità e il rispetto delle regole sono presupposti di cittadinanza. Chi ha senso del dovere non è considerato un eroe, bensì un cittadino che, consapevole delle proprie responsabilità, si prende l’onere di essere “normale” e fa il suo mestiere, con professionalità. In paesi meno sviluppati, il mito dell’eroe – attribuendo solo a pochi il dovere di rispettare lo Stato e la legge – permette di ignorare i propri obblighi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/il-presidente-mattarella-al-premio-ambrosoli-ambrosoli-e-stata-unoccasione-unica-di-fare-qualcosa-per-il-paese/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PREMIO AMBROSOLI. PRESIDENTE MATTARELLA: &#8220;UN ESEMPIO DI VIRTU’ CIVICHE”.</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/premio-ambrosoli-presidente-mattarella-un-esempio-di-virtu-civiche/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/premio-ambrosoli-presidente-mattarella-un-esempio-di-virtu-civiche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione di governo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Che si dice in giro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiltrazioni mafiose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maladministration e sprechi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mafia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mattarella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meritocrazia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidente della repubblica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergio Mattarella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Da solo, contro un potere criminale mafioso, fu «un esempio di virtù civiche. È stato insignito, difatti, della medaglia d&#8217;oro al valor civile, massimo riconoscimento della Repubblica. Come per altre figure di riferimento del nostro Paese, credo che, alla base del suo comportamento, vi [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/3.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-7093" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/3-1024x347.jpg" alt="3" width="1024" height="347" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Da solo, contro un potere criminale mafioso, fu «<em>un esempio di virtù civiche. È stato insignito, difatti, della medaglia d&#8217;oro al valor civile, massimo riconoscimento della Repubblica. Come per altre figure di riferimento del nostro Paese, credo che, alla base del suo comportamento, vi fosse la coscienza della propria dignità personale, e di quella del proprio ruolo, professionale e di responsabile di una funzione affidatagli dalla Repubblica. Questi aspetti hanno alimentato il suo coraggio, malgrado le intimidazioni e le minacce sempre più aggressive, di fronte alle quali ha impersonato la superiorità della legge dell&#8217;onestà</em>».</p>
<p>«<em>Il premio</em>&#8211; dice Mattarella, dopo aver rivolto un saluto alla vedova Annalori Gorla e ai figli Francesca e Umberto &#8211; <em>rappresenta un messaggio e un&#8217;occasione di riflessione. È di grande efficacia l&#8217;idea di legare il ricordo dell&#8217;avvocato Ambrosolia un riconoscimento che premia integrità, senso di responsabilità e qualificazione professionale: questa scelta contribuisce a collocarlo come riferimento dei tanti nostri concittadini che agiscono seguendo la propria coscienza, il senso del dovere e un&#8217;alta tensione morale</em>».</p>
<p>Il presidente della Repubblica Sergio Mattarella è intervenuto al Piccolo Teatro di Milano in occasione della settima edizione del premio Giorgio Ambrosoli, quest&#8217;anno «speciale» in occasione della quarantesima ricorrenza dell&#8217;omicidio del commissario liquidatore dell&#8217;impero fallito di Michele Sindona, il bancarottiere che, di fronte all&#8217;onestà e intransigenza dell&#8217;«Eroe Borghese», lo ha fatto uccidere da un sicario nella notte dell’11 luglio 1979.</p>
<p>Tuttavia, Mattarella ci tiene anche a dire che «<em>il nostro è un Paese sano, malgrado le zone d&#8217;ombra, i suoi tanti problemi. Milano esprime, in alto grado, queste capacità positive della società civile. Ambrosolisi era formato in questa cultura e ne rappresenta una figura emblematica</em>».</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/06/premio-ambrosoli-presidente-mattarella-un-esempio-di-virtu-civiche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
