




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NOi contro la CORRUZIONE &#187; Redazione</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anticorruzione.eu/author/redazione/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anticorruzione.eu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Save the date# 18/05/2020. Economy of Francesco- Agriculture and Justice Village presentation</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/05/save-the-date-18052020-economy-of-francesco-agriculture-and-justice-village-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/05/save-the-date-18052020-economy-of-francesco-agriculture-and-justice-village-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economy of Francesco- Agriculture and Justice Village presentation. Let’s meet today, 18 of May at 18:00 Italian time, to share with you guys our ideas, projects and collaborate with you to make a commitment, in the spirit of Saint Francis, in order to make the economy of today and tomorrow fair, sustainable and inclusive, with [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economy of Francesco- Agriculture and Justice Village presentation.<br />
Let’s meet today, 18 of May at 18:00 Italian time, to share with you guys our ideas, projects and collaborate with you to make a commitment, in the spirit of Saint Francis, in order to make the economy of today and tomorrow fair, sustainable and inclusive, with no one left behind.</p>
<p>link to the meeting: http://meet.google.com/ski-raje-aau<a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/1E1CDBD9-23A7-4EE6-86B8-1844470C45F6.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-7393" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/1E1CDBD9-23A7-4EE6-86B8-1844470C45F6-1024x576.jpeg" alt="1E1CDBD9-23A7-4EE6-86B8-1844470C45F6" width="1024" height="576" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/05/save-the-date-18052020-economy-of-francesco-agriculture-and-justice-village-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coronavirus, Scazzeri (anticorruzione): anche dopo l’emergenza rischio criminalità economica. Intervista del Gen. Gaetano Scazzeri tra l’altro anche docente del Master Anticorruzione, Università degli Studi Roma Tor Vergata. A cura di Gerardo Pelosi, Sole 24 ore.</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/04/coronavirus-scazzeri-anticorruzione-anche-dopo-lemergenza-rischio-criminalita-economica-intervista-del-gen-gaetano-scazzeri-tra-laltro-anche-docente-del-master-anticorruzione/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/04/coronavirus-scazzeri-anticorruzione-anche-dopo-lemergenza-rischio-criminalita-economica-intervista-del-gen-gaetano-scazzeri-tra-laltro-anche-docente-del-master-anticorruzione/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[L&#8217;emergenza sanitaria per far fronte al coronavirus ha fatto emergere l&#8217;esistenza di truffe, fenomeni corruttivi e criminalità economica diffusa su tutto il territorio nazionale. Ma, spiega a “Il Sole 24 Ore” il comandante del Nucleo speciale anticorruzione della Guardia di Finanza, generale Gaetano Scazzeri (tra l&#8217;altro docente del master anticorruzione dell&#8217;Università di Roma Tor Vergata) [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">L&#8217;emergenza sanitaria per far fronte al <a href="https://lab24.ilsole24ore.com/coronavirus/" target="_top">coronavirus </a>ha fatto emergere l&#8217;esistenza di truffe, fenomeni corruttivi e criminalità economica diffusa su tutto il territorio nazionale. Ma, spiega a “Il Sole 24 Ore” il comandante del Nucleo speciale anticorruzione della Guardia di Finanza, generale Gaetano Scazzeri (tra l&#8217;altro docente del master anticorruzione dell&#8217;Università di Roma Tor Vergata) «questo alert deve rimanere molto alto anche nella fase successiva all&#8217;emergenza Covid perché le misure prese adesso per contrastare le truffe sui dispositivi di protezione individuali come guanti e mascherine potrebbero valere in futuro anche per altri settori commerciali e potrebbero verificarsi indebiti utilizzi di fondi pubblici per le deroghe al codice degli appalti; il nostro compito – osserva sempre Scazzeri &#8211; anche dopo la fase 2 sarà quello di passare al setaccio con banche dati e fonti aperte tutti i contratti pubblici per evitare infiltrazioni e fenomeni corruttivi e offrire spunti investigativi ai reparti operativi».</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>I controlli della Guardia di Finanza</b><br />
Il generale Scazzeri ricorda che nelle ultime settimane l&#8217;azione della Guardia di Finanza si è concentrata nei controlli alle disposizioni del Governo sul lockdowon per cittadini e imprese e nell&#8217;offerta di servizi di sanificazione con un particolare focus alle truffe nella commercializzazione dei dispositivi di protezione individuale. A Torino, ricorda Scazzeri, l&#8217;operazione Linda ha acceso i riflettori su un contratto di sanificazione mentre si sono evidenziati violazioni all&#8217;obbligo di certificazione sui dispositivi come richiesto dall&#8217;Istituto superiore di Sanità e dall&#8217;Inail. «Una delle truffe più ricorrenti – aggiunge Scazzeri – riguarda la dizione CE non come certificato di garanzia europea bensì come China Export e le truffe su prodotti igienizzanti non corrispondenti alle caratteristiche specifiche».</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Sequestrati 2,8 milioni di mascherine non sicure</b><br />
Come ha ricordato in una recente audizione parlamentare il colonnello della Guardia di Finanza Pietro Bianchi dall&#8217;inizio dell&#8217;emergenza sono stati effettuati sequestri per un valore complessivo di 2,8 milioni di mascherine e dispositivi di protezione individuale in violazione alle normative di sicurezza o per frode in commercio. Sono state inoltre sequestrate oltre 147mila confezioni di igienizzanti non corrispondenti alle caratteristiche richieste. Per turbativa d&#8217;asta e inadempimenti in contratti di pubbliche forniture è stato arrestato un imprenditore a Roma che si era aggiudicato dalla Consip un appalto del valore di 15,8 milioni di euro per dispositivi di protezione e apparecchiature elettromedicali. «In molti casi – spiega il generale Scazzeri- il prezzo delle mascherine che prima dell&#8217;emergenza era anche inferiore a 0,50 euro è stato venduto a prezzi quintuplicati, ora il prezzo è stato fissato a 0,50 e vigileremo perchè venga rispettato».</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Al setaccio le deroghe il codice appalti</b><br />
Come avvenne anche per la fase successiva al terremoto dell&#8217;Aquila per deroghe al codice appalti che venivano interpretate in maniera molto estensiva anche in questo caso secondo Scazzeri rimangono delle rersponsabilità in capo alle stazioni appaltanti che dovrebbero impedire infiltrazioni e la cessione di appalti a imprese colpite da interdizione antimafia disposte dal prefetto. «Occorre quindi mantenere alta la guardia – spiega il comandante del Nucleo anticorruzione – insieme ad Anac monitoriamo la situazione per evitare che le deroghe al codice appalti e subappalti non autorizzati possano essere un veicolo utilizzato da imprese interdette o che usano capitali di provenienza illecita».</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Rischio usura connesso alle nuova crisi economica</b><br />
«Il rischio usura segnalato come monito morale anche dallo stesso Papa Francesco – osserva il generale Scazzeri – è legato all&#8217;attuale crisi economica derivante dal coronavirus: è un fenomeno che stiamo monitorando da vicino per il rischio sempre presente che organizzazioni criminali possano utilizzare le più diverse strategie per inquinare con i patrimoni illeciti di cui dispongono il circuito economico legale del Paese».</p>
<p>https://amp-ilsole24ore-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/amp.ilsole24ore.com/pagina/ADXlrIN</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/04/coronavirus-scazzeri-anticorruzione-anche-dopo-lemergenza-rischio-criminalita-economica-intervista-del-gen-gaetano-scazzeri-tra-laltro-anche-docente-del-master-anticorruzione/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>L’Antiriciclaggio dalla GdF alla UIF. Articolo a cura della Dr.ssa Ludovica Ferrara tutor e discente del Master Anticorruzione, IV Edizione, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/03/lantiriciclaggio-dalla-gdf-alla-uif-articolo-a-cura-della-dr-ssa-ludovica-ferrara-tutor-e-discente-del-master-anticorruzione-iv-edizione-universita-degli-studi-di-roma-tor-vergata/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/03/lantiriciclaggio-dalla-gdf-alla-uif-articolo-a-cura-della-dr-ssa-ludovica-ferrara-tutor-e-discente-del-master-anticorruzione-iv-edizione-universita-degli-studi-di-roma-tor-vergata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articoli Master Anticorruzione]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per parlare di antiriciclaggio è indispensabile citare la GdF, la quale, svolge per il nostro paese, l’importante ruolo di contrastare il rimpiego di denaro di origine illecita. Tale funzione nasce delle disposizioni del Decreto Legislativo n. 68 del 2001 il quale, prevede l’impiego di tale intelligence nel perseguire lo scopo di intercettare flussi economici e [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per parlare di antiriciclaggio è indispensabile citare la GdF, la quale, svolge per il nostro<br />
paese, l’importante ruolo di contrastare il rimpiego di denaro di origine illecita.<br />
Tale funzione nasce delle disposizioni del Decreto Legislativo n. 68 del 2001 il quale,<br />
prevede l’impiego di tale intelligence nel perseguire lo scopo di intercettare flussi<br />
economici e finanziari generati da comportamenti indebiti finalizzati ad inquinare il tessuto<br />
legale e di falsare le condizioni di concorrenza sul mercato.<br />
Il compito più focale è sostanzialmente l’attività repressiva svolta tramite indagini mentre,<br />
sul piano di prevenzione, fondamentali sono le segnalazioni su operazioni sospette poste in<br />
essere da intermediari finanziari, professionisti giurdico-contabili nonché mediatori<br />
creditizi, concessionari di gioco, società trasporti valori ecc. che si aggiungono ai controlli<br />
sulle movimentazioni transfrontaliere di valuta.<br />
Molto importanti, poi, sono anche le attività ispettive eseguite nei confronti dell’ampia<br />
platea di soggetti destinatari della normativa antiriciclaggio, al fine di verificare il corretto<br />
adempimento dei relativi obblighi (adeguata verifica della clientela, conservazione dei dati<br />
e segnalazione delle operazioni sospette) e prevenire l’utilizzo del sistema finanziario per<br />
scopi illeciti. L’obiettivo di fondo è seguire le tracce finanziarie dei reati che generano<br />
disponibilità economiche per poi promuovere le conseguenti iniziative volte al sequestro<br />
dei patrimoni accumulati illegalmente. L’ordinamento italiano, in materia di Antiriciclaggio<br />
si è sviluppato in coerenza con le disposizioni internazionali ed europee.<br />
Difatti, il decreto legislativo che ha recepito la direttiva europea è il 231 del 2007, il quale<br />
ha previsto una vera e propria architettura istituzionale in materia antiriciclaggio e di<br />
contrasto al finanziamento del terrorismo con lo svolgimento di attività di antiriciclaggio e<br />
di autoriciclaggio ovvero quelle attività economiche o finanziarie dei proventi illeciti da<br />
parte di coloro che hanno commesso o concorso a commettere il reato presupposto.<br />
Oltre al ruolo della Guardia di Finanza, tra le autorità tecniche un ruolo centrale è<br />
assegnato all&amp;#39;Unità di Informazione Finanziaria per l&amp;#39;Italia (UIF).<br />
Quest’ultima acquisisce e riceve informazioni inerenti ipotesi di riciclaggio e di<br />
finanziamento del terrorismo attraverso segnalazioni di operazioni sospette ed effettua<br />
l’analisi di dette informazioni al fine di valutarne la rilevanza per la trasmissione al Nucleo<br />
Speciale di Polizia Valutaria della Guardia di Finanza-NSPV e alla Direzione Investigativa<br />
Antimafia-DIA, organi competenti per gli accertamenti investigativi.<br />
Il suo compito è quello, appunto di approfondire, sotto l’aspetto finanziario, le segnalazioni<br />
ricevute dai destinatari degli obblighi; utilizzare i dati in suo possesso avvalendosi di fonti<br />
gestite dalla Banca d&amp;#39;Italia e di quelle di altre amministrazioni; scambia informazioni con<br />
FIU estere.</p>
<p>Ai fini dello svolgimento delle analisi di competenza la UIF può altresì acquisire dati<br />
investigativi al ricorrere di determinate condizioni.<br />
L&amp;#39;analisi finanziaria svolta dalla UIF, distinta dagli approfondimenti investigativi, consiste in<br />
una serie di attività volte ad arricchire il patrimonio informativo di ciascuna segnalazione,<br />
identificando soggetti e legami oggettivi, ricostruendo i flussi finanziari, anche<br />
transnazionali, selezionando i casi connotati da maggiore rischio.<br />
La UIF emana istruzioni sui dati e sulle informazioni che devono essere contenuti nelle<br />
segnalazioni di operazioni sospette e nelle comunicazioni, sulla relativa tempistica e sulle<br />
modalità di tutela di riservatezza del segnalante.<br />
Inoltre, al fine di agevolare l&amp;#39;individuazione di operazioni sospette da parte dei soggetti<br />
obbligati, la UIF emana, ora direttamente, indicatori di anomalia e diffonde specifici<br />
modelli o schemi rappresentativi di comportamenti anomali.<br />
Alla UIF, come alla GdF, spettano anche poteri di controllo ispettivo, volti ad accertare il<br />
rispetto degli obblighi di segnalazione di operazioni sospette e di comunicazione alla UIF o<br />
di acquisire specifici dati e informazioni.<br />
In materia di omesse segnalazioni di operazioni sospette, sono stabilite competenze<br />
sanzionatorie parallele del Ministero dell&amp;#39;economia e finanze e delle Autorità di vigilanza di<br />
settore, a seconda che la violazione sia contestata a una persona fisica o a una persona<br />
giuridica. Nel caso di violazioni gravi, ripetute o sistematiche ovvero plurime può essere<br />
disposta la pubblicazione del decreto sanzionatorio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/03/lantiriciclaggio-dalla-gdf-alla-uif-articolo-a-cura-della-dr-ssa-ludovica-ferrara-tutor-e-discente-del-master-anticorruzione-iv-edizione-universita-degli-studi-di-roma-tor-vergata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COE &#8211; GRECO, Strasbourg, 16 &#8211; 20 mar 2020, 85th Plenary Meeting</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/coe-greco-strasbourg-16-20-mar-2020-85th-plenary-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/coe-greco-strasbourg-16-20-mar-2020-85th-plenary-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Anticorruzione Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unione europea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) was established in 1999 by the Council of Europe to monitor States’ compliance with the organisation’s anti-corruption standards. GRECO’s objective is to improve the capacity of its members to fight corruption by monitoring their compliance with Council of Europe anti-corruption standards through a dynamic process of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5793" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png" alt="Schermata 2017-04-13 alle 08.45.03" width="235" height="176" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO)</b> was established in 1999 by the Council of Europe to monitor States’ compliance with the organisation’s anti-corruption standards.</p>
<p>GRECO’s <b>objective</b> is to improve the capacity of its members to fight corruption by monitoring their compliance with Council of Europe anti-corruption standards through a dynamic process of mutual evaluation and peer pressure. It helps to identify deficiencies in national anti-corruption policies, prompting the necessary legislative, institutional and practical reforms. GRECO also provides a platform for the sharing of best practice in the prevention and detection of corruption.</p>
<p><b>Membership</b> in GRECO, which is an enlarged agreement, is not limited to Council of Europe member States. Any State which took part in the elaboration of the enlarged partial agreement, may join by notifying the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. Moreover, any State which becomes Party to the Criminal or Civil Law Conventions on Corruption automatically accedes to GRECO and its evaluation procedures. <b>Currently, GRECO comprises 49 member States</b> (48 European States and the United States of America).</p>
<p>The <b>functioning</b> of GRECO is governed by its Statute and Rules of Procedure. Each member State appoints up to two representatives who participate in GRECO plenary meetings with a right to vote; each member also provides GRECO with a list of experts available for taking part in GRECO’s evaluations. Other Council of Europe bodies may also appoint representatives (e.g. the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe). GRECO has granted observer status to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the United Nations – represented by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. GRECO elects its President, Vice-President and members of its Bureau who play an important role in designing GRECO’s work programme and supervising the evaluation procedures.</p>
<p>GRECO’s Statutory Committee is composed of representatives on the Committee of Ministers of member States which have joined GRECO and of representatives specifically designated by other members of GRECO. It is competent for adopting GRECO’s <b>budget</b>. It is also empowered to issue a public statement if it considers that a member takes insufficient action in respect of the recommendations addressed to it.</p>
<p>GRECO’s Statute defines a <b>master-type procedure</b>, which can be adapted to the different legal instruments under review .</p>
<p>GRECO, which has its seat in Strasbourg, is assisted by a <b>Secretariat</b>, headed by an Executive Secretary, provided by the Secretary General of the Council of Europe.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.coe.int/en/web/greco/home">https://www.coe.int/en/web/greco/home</a></p>
<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png"> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/coe-greco-strasbourg-16-20-mar-2020-85th-plenary-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OECD &#8211; W.G. on Bribery, Paris, 10 &#8211; 13 mar 2020 &#8211; Plenary Meetings working Group on Bribery</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/oecd-w-g-on-bribery-paris-10-13-mar-2020-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/oecd-w-g-on-bribery-paris-10-13-mar-2020-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Anticorruzione Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/oecd-2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7277" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/oecd-2.jpg" alt="oecd 2" width="274" height="184" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system is conducted in successive phases and is considered by Transparency International to be the ‘gold standard’ of monitoring.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Made up of representatives from the States Parties to the Convention, the Working Group meets four times per year in Paris and publishes all of its country monitoring reports online.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/oecdworkinggrouponbriberyininternationalbusinesstransactions.htm">http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/oecdworkinggrouponbriberyininternationalbusinesstransactions.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/oecd-w-g-on-bribery-paris-10-13-mar-2020-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lagos, 23 &#8211; 25 feb. 2020, IBA Anti-Corruption in Africa Conference</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/lagos-23-25-feb-2020-iba-anti-corruption-in-africa-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/lagos-23-25-feb-2020-iba-anti-corruption-in-africa-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOPICS INCLUDE: The use of technology in the fight against corruption Anti- corruption, human rights and business The judiciary and anti-corruption: building confidence in the legal system Anti-corruption: legal frameworks and policies in Africa The EU and Brexit: lessons for the African Union The Cotonou Agreement 2020: how the new agreement will and should be [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h5></h5>
<h5><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/maladministration.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6978" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/maladministration.jpg" alt="maladministration" width="275" height="183" /></a></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5></h5>
<h5>TOPICS INCLUDE:</h5>
<ul>
<li>The use of technology in the fight against corruption</li>
<li>Anti- corruption, human rights and business</li>
<li>The judiciary and anti-corruption: building confidence in the legal system</li>
<li>Anti-corruption: legal frameworks and policies in Africa</li>
<li>The EU and Brexit: lessons for the African Union</li>
<li>The Cotonou Agreement 2020: how the new agreement will and should be drafted on mutual partnership</li>
</ul>
<p>More information:</p>
<p>https://www.ibanet.org/Conferences/conf1020.aspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2020/01/lagos-23-25-feb-2020-iba-anti-corruption-in-africa-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roma, Univ.Tor Vergata, Master Anticorruzione, IV ed., modulo &#8220;Lo standard ISO 37001. Organizzazione della prevenzione della corruzione e sistemi di controllo interno&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/roma-univ-tor-vergata-master-anticorruzione-iv-ed-modulo-lo-standard-iso-37001-organizzazione-della-prevenzione-della-corruzione-e-sistemi-di-controllo-interno/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/roma-univ-tor-vergata-master-anticorruzione-iv-ed-modulo-lo-standard-iso-37001-organizzazione-della-prevenzione-della-corruzione-e-sistemi-di-controllo-interno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Anticorruzione Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report anti-corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[università]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Il Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza dell&#8217;Università di Roma Tor Vergata nell&#8217;ambito del Master Anticorruzione, IV Edizione, a.a. 2018-2019, prevede &#8211;  dal 9 al 13 dicembre 2019  &#8211; il modulo IX &#8220;Lo standard ISO 37001. Organizzazione della prevenzione della corruzione e sistemi di controllo interno” Obiettivo del Modulo è descrivere i contenuti [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/tor-vergata-logo-new.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6867" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/tor-vergata-logo-new.png" alt="Logo Tor Vergata" width="434" height="116" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Il Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza dell&#8217;Università di Roma Tor Vergata nell&#8217;ambito del Master Anticorruzione, IV Edizione, a.a. 2018-2019, prevede &#8211;  dal 9 al 13 dicembre 2019  &#8211; il modulo IX<strong> &#8220;</strong><em><strong>Lo standard ISO 37001. Organizzazione della prevenzione della corruzione e sistemi di controllo interno”</strong></em></p>
<p>Obiettivo del Modulo è descrivere i contenuti della norma ISO 37001 e fornire tutti gli strumenti pratico/metodologici per attuarla nelle organizzazioni pubbliche e private, privilegiando un focus particolare sull’integrazione degli strumenti previsti da tale norma con i Modelli di prevenzione già previsti per legge: per la prevenzione della corruzione “passiva” (i PTPC ai sensi della Legge 190/2012) e per la prevenzione della corruzione “attiva” (i Modelli 231 ai sensi del D.lgs. 231/2001). Ciò al fine di fornire uno standard condiviso a livello internazionale e trasversale a livello settoriale, in grado di definire i requisiti minimi che i sistemi di Gestione Anticorruzione (SGA) devono avere nelle organizzazioni pubbliche e private, già chiamate per legge a sviluppare i propri Modelli 231/PTPC sulla base delle Linee Guida delle Associazioni di categoria e/o dell’ANAC.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>PROGRAMMA</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>ISO 37001 nelle Imprese. Inquadramento normativo e approccio metodologico &#8211; Analisi del contesto e confronto tra modelli di prevenzione in Italia e all’estero &#8211; Descrizione metodologia con casi pratici nelle Imprese</li>
<li>ISO 37001 nella P.A. Descrizione metodologia con casi pratici nel settore pubblico</li>
<li>Dal dire al fare l’interesse aziendale. Come diffondere la cultura organizzativa del bene comune</li>
<li>Anticorruzione e controlli interni nella P.A. L’impatto sulle Imprese</li>
<li>Integrazione dei sistemi Anticorruzione e Controlli Interni. Strumenti operativi</li>
<li>L’utilizzo delle piattaforme informatiche per l’automazione dei processi di controllo e monitoraggio. Casi pratici.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> </strong>Ogni informazione, all&#8217;indirizzo master.anticorruzione@uniroma2.it</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/roma-univ-tor-vergata-master-anticorruzione-iv-ed-modulo-lo-standard-iso-37001-organizzazione-della-prevenzione-della-corruzione-e-sistemi-di-controllo-interno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COE, STRASBOURG, 2 &#8211; 6 dec. 2019, GRECO 84th Plenary Meeting</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/coe-strasbourg-2-6-dec-2019-greco-84th-plenary-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/coe-strasbourg-2-6-dec-2019-greco-84th-plenary-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Azione di governo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maladministration e sprechi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; At its 83rd Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 17-21 June 2019), the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO): High-level conference: “GRECO: past, present &#38; future” (Monday 17 June – a.m.) 1. warmly welcomed the holding of this high-level event to mark GRECO’s 20th anniversary in cooperation with the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5793" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schermata-2017-04-13-alle-08.45.03.png" alt="Schermata 2017-04-13 alle 08.45.03" width="235" height="176" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>At its 83rd Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 17-21 June 2019), the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO):</p>
<p>High-level conference: “GRECO: past, present &amp; future” (Monday 17 June – a.m.)</p>
<p>1. warmly welcomed the holding of this high-level event to mark GRECO’s 20th anniversary in cooperation with the French Presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;1 and noted with pleasure the support expressed for GRECO’s work;</p>
<p>83rd Plenary Meeting</p>
<ol start="2">
<li>took note of the request by the Delegation of Denmark to postpone to a future meeting the examination of the Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark because of general elections held in June; as evaluations are of a technical not a political nature, GRECO decided to uphold the previous decisions by GRECO’s President and Bureau to not accept the request;</li>
<li>adopted the agenda of the meeting which was chaired by Marin MRČELA (President of GRECO, Croatia), and by Ernst GNAEGI (Bureau member, Switzerland) when the President had other commitments;</li>
</ol>
<p>Information</p>
<ol start="4">
<li>took note of information provided by Marin MRČELA, President of GRECO, and Gianluca ESPOSITO, Executive Secretary of GRECO;</li>
<li>took note of the list of items discussed and decisions taken by Bureau 87 (Greco(2019)6);</li>
<li>noted with regret that the Head of delegation of France, Agnès MAITREPIERRE, is leaving her country’s delegation and her position as GRECO’s Vice-President and wished her every success in her new functions;</li>
<li>noted that elections to fill the position of Vice-President will be held at GRECO 84 (2-6 December 2019) and that GRECO representatives are invited to inform the Executive Secretary in writing if they wish to stand for election/or to nominate a candidate, preferably by 1 October 2019, it nevertheless being understood that, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure (Rule 5), candidatures can be submitted up to 48 hours before the elections are held;</li>
</ol>
<p>Evaluation procedures</p>
<p>Fifth Round</p>
<ol start="8">
<li>adopted the Fifth Round Evaluation Reports on:
<ul>
<li>  Denmark (GrecoEval5Rep(2018)8)</li>
<li>  the Slovak Republic (GrecoEval5Rep(2018)9)</li>
<li>  Spain (GrecoEval5Rep(2018)5)and set the deadline of 31 December 2020 for the submission of situation reports on measures taken to implement GRECO’s recommendations;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>invites the authorities of Denmark, the Slovak Republic and Spain to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the reports mentioned in decision 8 above;</li>
</ol>
<p>1 Conference website : https://www.coe.int/en/web/greco/20th-anniversary-of-greco 2</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/3522a42e-b0b0-4801-976e-9a7f392a322b" alt="page2image3625477312" width="53.400000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/b349146f-4bf8-40ad-9712-520451879b9d" alt="page2image3625477584" width="100.200000" height="0.720030" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/beeea311-d2ca-4bad-a69e-cf20f95263ff" alt="page2image3625477856" width="144.020000" height="0.600040" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/4f9280ef-5792-4049-b1b0-6b10364a88a6" alt="page2image3625478128" width="229.850000" height="0.599980" /></p>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 3">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Compliance procedures</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/942232d2-5ac0-49d8-b0e6-5ee1af6e7d9c" alt="page3image3528080368" width="105.620000" height="0.720000" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Third Round<br />
10. adopted the 6th Interim Third Round Compliance Report on:</p>
<p> Switzerland (GrecoRC3(2019)5)</p>
<p>and decided not to continue applying Rule 32 in the case of that member;</p>
<ol start="11">
<li>in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.2 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Head of delegation of Switzerland to submit additional information regarding action taken to implement certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Third Round Compliance Report on:</li>
</ol>
<p> Denmark (GrecoRC3(2019)6)</p>
<p>and, in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 9 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Head of Delegation of Denmark to submit additional information regarding the implementation of certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</p>
<p>13. adopted the 2nd Addendum to the 2nd Third Round Compliance Report on:<br />
 the Russian Federation (GrecoRC3(2019)4)<br />
and terminated the compliance procedure in respect of this member, in this round;</p>
<p>14. invites the authorities of Switzerland, Denmark and the Russian Federation to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the reports mentioned in decisions 10, 12 and 13 above;</p>
<p>Fourth Round</p>
<ol start="15">
<li>adopted the Interim Fourth Round Compliance Reports on:
<ul>
<li>  Portugal (GrecoRC4(2019)13)</li>
<li>  Romania (GrecoRC4(2019)11)and concluded, in both cases, that the level of compliance with the recommendations remains “globally unsatisfactory” in the meaning of Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.3 of the Rules of Procedure;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>in accordance with Rule 32, paragraph 2 (i) of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Heads of delegation of Portugal and Romania to provide reports on progress in implementing the outstanding recommendations by 30 June 2020 at the latest (in the case of Romania, see also decision 27);</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>3</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 4">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ol start="17">
<li>pursuant to Rule 32, paragraph 2 (ii) a) of the Rules of Procedure, invites its President to send letters – with a copy to the President of the Statutory Committee – to the Heads of Delegation of Portugal and Romania on the need to take determined action with a view to achieving tangible progress as soon as possible;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Interim Fourth Round Compliance Report on:
<ul>
<li>  Belgium (GrecoRC4(2019)15)</li>
<li>  Spain (GrecoRC4(2019)12)and decided not to continue applying Rule 32 in the case of both members;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.2 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Heads of delegation of Belgium and Spain to submit additional information regarding action taken to implement certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Fourth Round Compliance Report on:</li>
</ol>
<p> Germany (GrecoRC4(2019)17)</p>
<p>and concluded that the level of compliance with the recommendations is “globally unsatisfactory” in the meaning of Rule 31 revised, paragraph 8.3 of the Rules of Procedure;</p>
<ol start="21">
<li>pursuant to Rule 32, paragraph 2 (i), requests the Head of delegation of Germany to provide a report on progress in implementing the outstanding recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
<li>adopted the 2nd Fourth Round Compliance Reports on:
<ul>
<li>  Lithuania (GrecoRC4(2019)18)</li>
<li>  Malta (GrecoRC4(2019)14)and, in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 9 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Heads of Delegation of Lithuania and Malta to submit additional information regarding the implementation of certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Adopted the Addendum to the 2nd Fourth Round Compliance Report on:</li>
</ol>
<p> Iceland (GrecoRC4(2019)16)</p>
<p>and, in accordance with Rule 31 revised, paragraph 9 of the Rules of Procedure, requests the Head of delegation of Iceland to submit additional information regarding the implementation of certain recommendations by 30 June 2020;</p>
<ol start="24">
<li>noted with satisfaction that the authorities of Iceland authorise the publication of the report mentioned in decision 23 above;</li>
<li>invites the authorities of Portugal, Romania, Belgium, Spain, Germany, Lithuania and Malta to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the reports mentioned in decisions 15, 18, 20 et 22 above;</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>4</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 5">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Fifth Round</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>26. approved the list of rapporteur countries for the Fifth Round compliance procedures in respect of the following countries: Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Slovenia and the United Kingdom (GrecoEval5(2019)1)</p>
<p>Rule 34 – Ad hoc procedure</p>
<ol start="27">
<li>adopted the Follow-up Report (Greco-AdHocRep(2019)1) to the Ad hoc Report (Rule 34) on Romania and invites the Head of Delegation of Romania to submit, by 30 June 2020, additional information on the implementation of those ad hoc recommendations under the ongoing Fourth Round compliance procedure;</li>
<li>invites the authorities of Romania to authorise, as soon as possible, the publication of the report mentioned in decision 27 above;</li>
<li>pursuant to Rule 34, decided to initiate an ad hoc procedure in respect of Greece (Greco(2019)9- rev) and to request the Head of Delegation to submit, by 30 September 2019,2 detailed official information concerning the recently amended Article 236 of the Criminal Code and its impact on the effectiveness of the fight against corruption, to be examined at GRECO 84 (2-6 December 2019);</li>
<li>at the request of the Head of delegation of Slovenia and on the basis of information and documents provided by her, decided, pursuant to Rule 34, to request the Head of Delegation to submit, by 30 June 2019, any additional information concerning the separation of powers between the legislature and the judiciary in Slovenia;</li>
<li>instructed the Secretariat to nominate rapporteurs for the above procedures in respect of Greece and Slovenia once the additional official information is received;</li>
</ol>
<p>Evaluation of the Council of Europe support in the fight against corruption – follow-up to be given to the recommendations of the Directorate of Internal Oversight (DIO)</p>
<ol start="32">
<li>welcomed the result of the discussion by Bureau 87 on follow-up (action plan: Greco(2019)8);</li>
<li>discussed further follow-up to be included in the action plan, instructed the Secretariat to revise the action plan accordingly and to inform the Directorate of Internal Oversight of the result of the consultation of the Bureau and the Plenary;</li>
</ol>
<p>Request for observer status in GRECO – European Union</p>
<ol start="34">
<li>considered the request by the European Union for observer status in GRECO (Greco(2019)7) prepared under the Romanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and signed by European Commission First Vice-President Frans TIMMERMANS and Commissioner Dimitris AVRAMOPOULOS;</li>
<li>noted that all GRECO member States except Turkey3 agreed to grant observer status in GRECO to the European Union, and therefore decided to refer the European Union’s request to the Committee of Ministers for decision;</li>
</ol>
<p>2 Should this legislation not enter into force, the application of the Rule 34 procedure will be reviewed.<br />
3 The Delegation of Turkey underlined that it supports the European Union participating in GRECO as a member but not as an observer.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/73c6c8ae-3a82-46fd-bd5e-d385e9139d26" alt="page5image3626013184" width="123.620000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/200ffe9a-eff2-4426-abe6-b489ba1622ef" alt="page5image3626013456" width="463.660000" height="0.720000" /><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/7f6e2bb6-1970-46d5-9280-8ee3a3e4f128" alt="page5image3626013728" width="302.450000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/50fd3384-782b-4689-baf4-5cda84ff7bd5" alt="page5image3626014064" width="251.210000" height="0.720030" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/f7de70b8-1808-45ba-b102-598677053ebc" alt="page5image3626014336" width="144.020000" height="0.599980" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>5</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 6">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Budgetary situation &#8211; update</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/5a1923f0-dc16-4efd-8ca4-36cca1cc9836" alt="page6image3626191680" width="127.940000" height="0.720000" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ol start="36">
<li>noted that a meeting of GRECO’s Statutory Committee is scheduled on 28 June 2019 to consider, if necessary, whether to not apply Article 8, paragraph 6 of GRECO’s Statute in respect of the Russian Federation; the relevant provision stipulates that “unless otherwise decided by the Statutory Committee, a member which has failed to pay all or a substantial part of its compulsory contribution to the budget of the enlarged partial agreement for a period of two years, shall no longer take part in the decision-making process”;</li>
<li>welcomed the additional financial and/or “in-kind” contributions for the 2018/2019 biennium made so far by Armenia, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United States, and the more recent announcement of a contribution from Sweden; noted that these contributions are instrumental in enabling GRECO to carry out its programme of activities and that the call for voluntary contributions will be renewed for the 2020/2021 budget;</li>
</ol>
<p>Topical anti-corruption developments/events in member States (Item 4)</p>
<p>38. took note of the information provided by the Delegations of Cyprus,4 Hungary, Italy,5 Republic of Moldova,6 Montenegro, Serbia and Sweden;</p>
<p>Publication of Reports7</p>
<p>39. called on the authorities of the member States concerned (Austria,8 Belarus,9 Georgia,10 Hungary,11 Republic of Moldova12) to authorise without further delay the publication of the reports adopted by GRECO at previous plenary meetings, noting that the reports on Belarus date back to the period 2012-2017 and two of the reports on Hungary date back to March and June 2017;</p>
<p>Information from observer organisations and Council of Europe bodies</p>
<p>40. took note of the information provided by the representative of UNODC, notably in relation to the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on anti-corruption that will be held in 2021;</p>
<p>4 GRECO took note of the information provided by Cyprus in relation to the “Guide to judicial conduct”, training, and criteria for the appointment of judges and will take it into account in the context of the ongoing Fourth Round compliance procedure. 5 Given that the information provided by Italy concerns an evolving situation on a matter covered by the previous evaluation round, GRECO invites the Italian delegation to provide an up-date at GRECO 84 (December 2019).</p>
<p>6 GRECO invites the Moldovan delegation to provide written information concerning the composition of the Superior Council of Prosecutors and the transparency of the legislative process by 31 July 2019.<br />
7 Action to be taken when publishing adopted reports (decision 26, GRECO 58):</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8211;  agree a same-day publication date with the Secretariat</li>
<li>&#8211;  clearly mark both the date of adoption and date of publication on the cover page</li>
<li>&#8211;  make the national language version available and easily accessible on a domestic website</li>
<li>&#8211;  notify the Secretariat of the location of the report by communicating the internet link to it</li>
<li>&#8211;  include a link on the domestic website to the official language versions on GRECO’s website.8 Fourth Round Compliance Report.<br />
9 All reports from the Joint First and Second Rounds; Third Round Evaluation Report; Third Round Compliance Report.<br />
10 Fourth Round Compliance Report.<br />
11 2nd Addendum to the 2nd Third Round Compliance Report; Fourth Round Compliance Report; Interim Fourth Round Compliance Report.<br />
12 Fourth Round Compliance Report.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/aed71500-d39a-4c0d-85a3-a597297bbea9" alt="page6image3624703520" width="284.210000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/bfa50736-9614-46ac-a556-eff5a5a58d24" alt="page6image3624703920" width="102.480000" height="0.720000" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/ffc578f0-7886-4943-adc4-1f34c993b513" alt="page6image3624704256" width="315.290000" height="0.720000" /><img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/973500e6-3834-46b0-87a5-146f00bb8c65" alt="page6image3624704528" width="144.020000" height="0.599980" /> <img src="blob:http://anticorruzione.eu/d6e8ae56-83f5-4d9d-94df-c6b256b1e821" alt="page6image3624705136" width="200.570000" height="0.599980" /></p>
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>6</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 7">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Miscellaneous<br />
41. welcomed the availability, since 17 June 2019, of the HUDOC-GRECO Database;</p>
<p>Forthcoming meetings<br />
42. took note of the following dates:</p>
<p>2019</p>
<ul>
<li>  88th Bureau meeting (Strasbourg, 18 October 2019)</li>
<li>  84th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 2-6 December 2019)2020</li>
<li>  85th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 16-20 March 2020)</li>
<li>  86th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 25-29 May 2020)</li>
<li>  87th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 26-30 October 2020).</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/11/coe-strasbourg-2-6-dec-2019-greco-84th-plenary-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU, OLAF, BRUSSELS, 7 Nov. 2019, Meeting of the Fraud Prevention Group</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/eu-olaf-brussels-7-nov-2019-meeting-of-the-fraud-prevention-group/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/eu-olaf-brussels-7-nov-2019-meeting-of-the-fraud-prevention-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azione Amministrativa e Prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unione Europea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalti pubblici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OLAF investigates fraud against the EU budget, corruption and serious misconduct within the European institutions, and develops anti-fraud policy for the European Commission. This group provides a forum for national authorities and the Commission to share experience and best practice in areas such as: Fraud risk assessment Fraud typology National/sectoral fraud prevention strategies, policies and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-olaf_0.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7180" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-olaf_0.png" alt="logo-olaf_0" width="220" height="51" /></a></p>
<p>OLAF investigates fraud against the EU budget, corruption and serious misconduct within the European institutions, and develops anti-fraud policy for the European Commission.</p>
<p>This group provides a forum for national authorities and the Commission to share experience and best practice in areas such as:</p>
<p>Fraud risk assessment<br />
Fraud typology<br />
National/sectoral fraud prevention strategies, policies and measures<br />
How managing, certifying and audit services contribute to fraud prevention and detection<br />
How IT is used to track potential fraud cases and identify risks<br />
Awareness raising &amp; training of desk officers, financial bodies and auditors<br />
Twinning projects &amp; activities funded by the Hercule programme<br />
Anonymised case studies.<br />
This group may address issues involving EU funds (European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), Agriculture Funds, Fisheries Funds, Asylum and Migration Funds, …).</p>
<p>This group brings together national authorities responsible for reporting on fraud and irregularities and a number of Commission services, and deals with:</p>
<p>The Commission&#8217;s Annual Report on the protection of the EU’s financial interests (also known as the &#8220;PIF-Report&#8221; or the &#8220;Article 325 TFEU-Report&#8221;); prepared annually in cooperation with the Member States.<br />
The sectoral irregularity reporting provisions<br />
The Irregularity Management System (IMS)<br />
Statistical analysis of reported irregularity cases</p>
<p>Materiali all&#8217;indirizzo:<br />
https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/media-corner/events/19-12-2018/meeting-fraud-prevention-group_en</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/eu-olaf-brussels-7-nov-2019-meeting-of-the-fraud-prevention-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OECD, PARIS, WG ON BRIBERY, 10-13 dec 2019, Plenary Meetings Working Group on Bribery</title>
		<link>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/oecd-paris-8-11-oct-2019-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/</link>
		<comments>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/oecd-paris-8-11-oct-2019-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analisi e Ricerche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eventi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unione Europea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anticorruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalità]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevenzione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pubblica amministrazione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tor Vergata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trasparenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticorruzione.eu/?p=7175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system is conducted in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/oecd_logo.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5767" src="http://anticorruzione.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/oecd_logo.png" alt="oecd_logo" width="567" height="175" /></a></p>
<p>Established in 1994, the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (Working Group) is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2009 Recommendation on Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Bribery in International Business Transactions (2009 Anti-Bribery Recommendation) and related instruments. This peer-review monitoring system is conducted in successive phases and is considered by Transparency International to be the ‘gold standard’ of monitoring.</p>
<p>http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/oecdworkinggrouponbriberyininternationalbusinesstransactions.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anticorruzione.eu/2019/09/oecd-paris-8-11-oct-2019-plenary-meetings-working-group-on-bribery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
